Penetration Testing: Everything Your Business Needs to Know

What Is Penetration Testing?

Most vulnerability scans produce a spreadsheet of CVEs ranked by CVSS score. They tell you that a weakness exists. They do not tell you whether an attacker can actually exploit it, what they can reach once they do, or what the business impact looks like when the entire attack chain is executed. That gap between "vulnerability exists" and "here is what an attacker can actually do with it" is the gap penetration testing fills.

Penetration testing is a controlled, authorized simulation of a real-world attack against your systems, networks, and applications. Skilled human testers chain together multiple vulnerabilities and misconfigurations to demonstrate realistic attack paths. A scan might flag a SQL injection vulnerability. A penetration test demonstrates that the SQL injection can be leveraged to extract the entire customer database, pivot into the internal network, and compromise the domain controller. This context is essential for prioritizing remediation because it shows real business impact rather than relying on generic severity scores.

Penetration testing is also a regulatory requirement for many organizations. PCI DSS requires annual penetration tests and testing after significant changes. HIPAA requires regular technical evaluation of security controls. SOC 2 auditors expect evidence of security testing. CMMC requires penetration testing for certain maturity levels. Beyond compliance, penetration testing provides the empirical evidence that security leaders need to justify investments, demonstrate risk to executive leadership, and validate that security controls work as intended.

Types of Penetration Tests

Penetration tests are categorized by scope, target, and the level of information provided to the testing team. Understanding these categories helps you define the right engagement for your needs.

External network penetration testing targets your internet-facing infrastructure: public IP ranges, web servers, email gateways, VPN concentrators, DNS servers, and cloud-hosted services. The tester operates from the perspective of an external attacker with no internal access and attempts to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited to gain initial access. OmegaBlack's external tests begin with the same reconnaissance techniques that real threat actors use, including dark web searches for any previously leaked credentials or infrastructure details related to your organization.

Internal network penetration testing simulates a threat actor who has already gained access to your internal network through a phishing attack, a compromised employee, or a physical breach. The tester operates from within your network and attempts to escalate privileges, move laterally, access sensitive data, and compromise critical systems such as domain controllers and database servers. Internal testing reveals how well your network segmentation, access controls, and detection capabilities perform against an active intruder.

Web application penetration testing focuses specifically on web-based applications and APIs. Testers evaluate authentication mechanisms, session management, input validation, authorization controls, business logic, and API security. This testing follows the OWASP Testing Guide and covers vulnerability classes including injection attacks, cross-site scripting, insecure deserialization, broken access control, and server-side request forgery.

Wireless penetration testing assesses the security of your wireless networks, including corporate Wi-Fi, guest networks, and any rogue access points. Testers evaluate encryption protocols, authentication mechanisms, network segmentation between wireless and wired networks, and susceptibility to attacks such as evil twin access points and deauthentication attacks.

Social engineering testing evaluates your organization's human defenses through phishing campaigns, vishing calls, pretexting, and physical social engineering. This testing reveals how well your security awareness training is working and identifies gaps in human-layer defenses that technical controls cannot address.

Testing Methodologies & Frameworks

Professional penetration testing follows established methodologies that ensure consistent, thorough, and reproducible results. OmegaBlack's offensive security team layers these proven frameworks with proprietary intelligence that transforms a standard assessment into a threat-informed engagement.

The Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES) is the most widely adopted methodology for network and infrastructure testing. PTES defines seven phases: pre-engagement interactions, intelligence gathering, threat modeling, vulnerability analysis, exploitation, post-exploitation, and reporting. Each phase has defined objectives, tools, and deliverables that ensure comprehensive coverage.

The OWASP Testing Guide provides the definitive methodology for web application security testing. Version 4.2 defines over 90 specific test cases organized into categories including information gathering, configuration management, identity management, authentication, authorization, session management, input validation, error handling, cryptography, business logic, and client-side testing. Testers who follow OWASP ensure that every relevant attack surface in a web application is evaluated.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is increasingly used to map penetration testing activities to real-world adversary techniques. By mapping test cases to ATT&CK technique IDs, testers demonstrate exactly which adversary behaviors they simulated and identify gaps in detection coverage. This mapping is particularly valuable when penetration testing is conducted alongside a purple team engagement where the detection team is actively monitoring.

OmegaBlack follows PTES for infrastructure engagements and OWASP for application testing, while mapping all findings to MITRE ATT&CK. But we add a layer that generic testing firms do not have: intelligence from our threat research. Before we begin testing, our threat intelligence team briefs the offensive security team on the specific tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by threat actors currently targeting our client's industry. This means our testers simulate the adversaries you are most likely to face, not a generic attacker from a textbook. When we tested a technology company's infrastructure, this approach led to the discovery of a source code exposure path that a standard pen test would have missed, because we knew to look for it based on threat actor interest in that company's IP.

The Pen Test Process

OmegaBlack's penetration test engagements follow a defined process from initial scoping through final report delivery. Each phase is designed to maximize the real-world value of the testing.

Scoping and pre-engagement defines the boundaries, objectives, and rules of engagement. This includes identifying in-scope systems and networks, defining testing windows, establishing communication channels for critical findings, and agreeing on authorized actions. During scoping, we also pull intelligence from our dark web monitoring platform to determine whether any credentials, access, or data related to the client's environment are already circulating. This pre-engagement intelligence shapes our attack plan to mirror what a real adversary would already know.

Reconnaissance and information gathering maps the attack surface. For external tests, this includes DNS enumeration, subdomain discovery, technology fingerprinting, OSINT collection, certificate transparency log analysis, and identification of exposed services. OmegaBlack's reconnaissance extends into dark web and deep web sources that most testing firms do not access: leaked credential databases, paste sites, initial access broker listings, and threat actor discussions mentioning the target organization.

Vulnerability discovery and exploitation is the core of the engagement. We identify vulnerabilities through a combination of automated scanning and manual testing, then exploit them to demonstrate real-world impact. Our testers chain multiple low-severity vulnerabilities together to achieve high-impact outcomes that automated scanners would never identify. For example, combining a path traversal vulnerability with a local file inclusion and a misconfigured service account to achieve remote code execution on a production server.

Post-exploitation demonstrates what an attacker could accomplish after gaining initial access: privilege escalation, lateral movement, data access, persistence mechanisms, and potential business impact. This phase is where the value of penetration testing becomes clear because it shows the practical consequences of each vulnerability in the context of your specific environment.

Reporting and debrief is where the engagement becomes actionable. OmegaBlack reports include an executive summary for leadership, detailed technical findings with proof-of-concept evidence, risk ratings based on exploitability and business impact, and specific remediation recommendations prioritized by risk. Every critical finding is reported immediately during the engagement, not held for the final report. Our debrief sessions include both leadership-level risk summaries and deep technical walkthroughs for engineering teams.

Red Teaming vs. Pen Testing

Red teaming and penetration testing serve different purposes and are appropriate at different stages of security maturity.

A penetration test is scope-defined and vulnerability-focused. The objective is to find as many exploitable vulnerabilities as possible within the defined scope and time window. Testers work within a specific segment of your environment and their goal is comprehensive vulnerability coverage within that scope. Penetration tests are typically completed within one to three weeks.

A red team engagement is objective-driven and adversary-focused. The red team is given a specific objective, such as accessing the CEO's email, exfiltrating customer financial data, or compromising a specific production system, and uses any combination of techniques to achieve that objective. This includes technical exploitation, social engineering, physical access, and supply chain attacks. OmegaBlack's red team engagements simulate the specific adversary campaigns that our threat intelligence team has identified as relevant to the client's industry, using the same TTPs that real threat groups employ.

A critical distinction: penetration testers work to avoid detection to maximize testing time, but detection avoidance is not a primary objective. Red teams actively employ evasion techniques because testing your detection and response capabilities is a core part of the engagement. OmegaBlack's red team engagements produce dual deliverables: findings about exploitable attack paths and a detailed assessment of where your detection and response capabilities succeeded or failed. For clients who also use our MDR service, red team findings feed directly into detection engineering improvements.

Purple teaming adds a collaborative dimension where the red team works alongside your blue team to test specific detection capabilities, develop new detection rules, and validate response procedures. OmegaBlack's purple team engagements are the fastest path to improving detection coverage because the feedback loop between offense and defense is immediate. Our offensive security team simulates a technique, your defenders attempt to detect it, and both teams iterate on the detection logic in real time.

For organizations that have never conducted offensive testing, start with a penetration test to identify and remediate the most critical vulnerabilities. Once your baseline security is solid, progress to red team engagements to test detection and response capabilities against realistic adversary simulations.

Frequency & Cost Considerations

How often you should conduct penetration testing depends on your risk profile, regulatory requirements, and the pace of change in your environment. At minimum, annual penetration testing is a baseline best practice and is required by most compliance frameworks.

Annual testing alone is insufficient for environments that change frequently. You should conduct additional testing after significant infrastructure changes (cloud migrations, new application deployments, major network changes), after mergers and acquisitions, when introducing new technology (IoT devices, OT systems, AI platforms), and when threat intelligence indicates your industry is being actively targeted. Organizations with mature security programs test quarterly, rotating through different segments of their environment.

Penetration testing costs vary based on scope, complexity, and provider quality. For external network testing of a typical mid-market organization (50 to 200 external IP addresses), expect $15,000 to $40,000. Internal network testing for a similar environment typically runs $20,000 to $50,000. Web application testing ranges from $10,000 to $30,000 per application depending on complexity. Red team engagements, given their longer duration and broader scope, typically range from $50,000 to $150,000 or more.

Be cautious of providers offering pen testing at significantly below-market rates. Quality penetration testing requires experienced, highly skilled testers, and the primary cost driver is human expertise. Providers offering cut-rate pricing are typically running automated scans, using junior testers, or allocating insufficient time. The result is a report that tells you little more than a vulnerability scan would have, which defeats the purpose.

OmegaBlack clients who maintain ongoing engagements, such as combining MDR with annual penetration testing and quarterly vulnerability assessments, receive preferential scheduling and pricing. More importantly, the continuity means our testers build institutional knowledge of your environment over time, leading to deeper findings with each successive engagement.

How OmegaBlack Conducts Pen Tests

OmegaBlack's offensive security team is not a group of scanner operators. Our testers come from backgrounds in military and intelligence offensive operations, incident response, and threat research. They hold certifications including OSCP, OSCE, OSWE, GPEN, GXPN, and CREST CRT/CCT. More importantly, they have real-world experience breaking into environments defended by sophisticated security teams, and they contribute to the security community through tool development, vulnerability research, and conference presentations.

What sets OmegaBlack's testing apart is the intelligence integration. Before every engagement, our offensive security team receives a briefing from our threat intelligence analysts on the specific threat actors targeting the client's industry, the techniques those actors favor, and any dark web activity related to the client's organization. This intelligence shapes the engagement to mirror realistic adversary behavior. When our intelligence team discovered that a threat actor was actively researching a manufacturing client's supply chain, we incorporated supply chain attack simulation into the pen test scope. The result: we identified an attack path through a vendor portal that would have given an attacker access to $50M in intellectual property.

Our reporting reflects this depth. Every OmegaBlack pen test report includes detailed attack narratives that explain how vulnerabilities were chained together, proof-of-concept evidence for each finding, business impact assessments specific to your environment, and prioritized remediation guidance your team can implement immediately. We also map every finding to MITRE ATT&CK techniques and include detection recommendations, so your blue team knows exactly what to look for if an attacker attempts the same path.

The connection between our offensive security, threat intelligence, and MDR teams creates a continuous improvement cycle. Techniques our pen testers discover in client environments inform new detection rules for our MDR platform. Threats our intelligence team identifies on the dark web shape pen test scenarios. Incidents our DFIR team investigates reveal real-world attack paths that our pen testers then validate across other client environments. No standalone testing firm can offer this integration because they lack the intelligence and detection infrastructure to support it.

Acting on Results

The penetration test report is only valuable if your organization acts on the findings. Many organizations invest in testing but fail to follow through on remediation, spending money to document risk without actually reducing it.

Start by presenting findings to the appropriate stakeholders. The executive summary should go to leadership and the board to communicate the overall risk picture. Technical findings should go to the engineering and IT teams responsible for remediation. Frame findings in terms of business risk, not just technical severity. Instead of "we found a critical SQL injection vulnerability," explain that "an attacker could use this vulnerability to extract the entire customer database, resulting in regulatory fines, legal liability, and reputational damage."

Prioritize remediation based on exploitability and business impact, not just CVSS scores. A medium-severity vulnerability on a system containing regulated data that is directly accessible from the internet may deserve higher priority than a critical vulnerability on an isolated development server. OmegaBlack's reports include a prioritized remediation roadmap that addresses the highest-risk findings first while providing a realistic timeline for lower-priority items.

Track remediation progress and validate fixes. Maintain a findings tracker that assigns each vulnerability to an owner, defines a remediation deadline, and tracks status. Once remediation is complete, conduct validation testing to confirm fixes are effective. OmegaBlack offers focused retest engagements specifically for this purpose, typically at reduced scope and cost compared to a full engagement.

For OmegaBlack clients using our MDR service, pen test findings have a second life: they inform detection engineering. When we discover an exploitable attack path during a pen test, we build detection rules for that specific path and deploy them to our MDR platform. This means your environment gains both a fixed vulnerability and a new detection capability, closing the gap from both sides simultaneously.

Related Services